TwinTurbo.NET: Nissan 300ZX forum - I have Eibachs on my 2+2. It's not bad, but I suggest RS*R.
People Seeking Info
 
   


     
Subject I have Eibachs on my 2+2. It's not bad, but I suggest RS*R.
     
Posted by Z U N L on February 15, 2006 at 4:39 PM
  This message has been viewed 58 times.
     
In Reply To suggestions posted by dondon on February 15, 2006 at 12:49 PM
     
Message I kind of prefer linear spring rates (even though it makes some bumps feel a bit harsher), so I would personally recommend the RS*R springs. Also, the Eibachs do not take the difference between 2+2 and 2+0 into account, so the rear end on the 2+2 will drop a bit more than it would if you had a 2+0, which kind of gives the car a slight "squatting" look and annoys me.

I used to have Ground Control coil-over sleeves (which come with linear rate Eibach springs) and I liked the spring rate, but I believe that the springs which they included were the wrong height. There was basically no pre-load at all on the springs, even at the highest setting on the perch, and the car was dangerously low as well.



"The two seater is being joined in a few weeks by a larger two-plus-two model with a rear seat for munchkins." ~Jim Mateja, Chicago Tribune, in regards to the Z32.

Andrew Janeshek // jnshk@aol.com // 1992 NA 2+2 [Stage 2-ish]
Click here for my home page.

     
Follow Ups  
     
Post a
Followup

You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.